....Sorry, still laughing at the usericon under which you posted this. Ah, JW, how Thou'rt fallen.
My contributions to this debate are as follows: 1) Even the "plausible story" standard of evidence is more than the faith-based explanations have going for 'em; 2) I guess I subscribe to Dawkinsism, primarily because the man is so damn charming; 3) Science *is* a religion to too many people (i.e. they place undue, uncritical faith in it -- I'm talking about laypersons here, not prof'l scientists; 4) I'm adding you, but how do I know you?? An abundance of Faith icons (heh) in your comments section suggests....but then again....eh, what the heck. ATHEISTS UNTIE!!
Hahahahaha
My contributions to this debate are as follows:
1) Even the "plausible story" standard of evidence is more than the faith-based explanations have going for 'em;
2) I guess I subscribe to Dawkinsism, primarily because the man is so damn charming;
3) Science *is* a religion to too many people (i.e. they place undue, uncritical faith in it -- I'm talking about laypersons here, not prof'l scientists;
4) I'm adding you, but how do I know you?? An abundance of Faith icons (heh) in your comments section suggests....but then again....eh, what the heck. ATHEISTS UNTIE!!